References
Academic research, industry perspectives, and thought leadership on the evolution beyond traditional Agile.
Key Articles
Industry Thought Leaders
Dave Thomas — “Time to Kill Agile”
Link: pragdave.me/blog/2014/03/04/time-to-kill-agile.html
Key Points:
Agile Manifesto co-author calls for moving past “Agile Industrial Complex”
Distinguishes between agile (lowercase-a, the values) and Agile (capital-A, the industry)
Argues process frameworks have become too rigid and prescriptive
Advocates for returning to core principles of adaptation
Notable Quote:
“The word ‘agile’ has been subverted to the point where it is effectively meaningless, and what passes for an agile community seems to be largely an arena for consultants and vendors to hawk services and products.”
Harvard Business Review — “Have We Taken Agile Too Far?”
Link: hbr.org/2021/04/have-we-taken-agile-too-far
Key Points:
Questions whether Agile has become too formalized
Examines unintended consequences of widespread Agile adoption
Discusses tension between agility and stability
Explores when Agile frameworks may hinder rather than help
Insights:
Agile can create as much bureaucracy as it eliminates
Constant change can exhaust teams
Not all work benefits from Agile approaches
TechBeacon — “The End of Agile”
Link: techbeacon.com/app-dev-testing/end-agile-why-agile-should-be-replaced
Key Points:
Explores why Agile may not fit modern development
Discusses DevOps and continuous delivery as evolution
Examines role of automation in replacing manual Agile practices
Argues for principles over frameworks
Themes:
Automation changes what humans need to do
Continuous delivery supersedes sprint-based releases
Modern tools enable better approaches
Books
Radical Therapy for Software Teams
Link: apress.com/gp/book/9781484294933
Author: Buildly’s founder
Topics Covered:
Origins of the RAD process
Transitioning from Agile to RAD
AI-assisted development practices
Case studies and real-world examples
Implementation strategies
Recommended For:
Engineering leaders
Product managers
Agile coaches looking to evolve
Teams feeling constrained by Agile frameworks
The Agile Manifesto (2001)
Link: agilemanifesto.org
Historical Importance:
Foundation document for Agile movement
Core values still relevant
Principles that inspired RAD
Why Still Relevant:
RAD builds on these values, not against them. Understanding the original intent helps appreciate the evolution.
Research Papers
“Agile Software Development: The Business of Innovation”
Authors: Various academic researchers
Key Findings:
Agile practices improve innovation in certain contexts
Effectiveness depends on team size, project type
Ceremonies can become overhead at scale
Need for adaptation to organizational context
“The Impact of AI on Software Development Practices”
Recent Studies:
AI can reduce estimation error by 40-60%
Automated testing coverage improves with AI assistance
Developer productivity increases with AI coding assistants
Context switching reduced by intelligent automation
Industry Reports
State of DevOps Report (Annual)
Publisher: DORA (DevOps Research and Assessment)
Key Metrics:
Elite performers deploy multiple times per day
Lead time for changes: less than one hour
Change failure rate: 0-15%
Time to restore service: less than one hour
Relevance to RAD:
These metrics align with RAD’s adaptive cadence and continuous delivery principles.
State of Agile Report
Publisher: Digital.ai (formerly CollabNet VersionOne)
Annual Trends:
Growing adoption of DevOps practices
Shift toward continuous delivery
Increased use of automation
Recognition of Agile scaling challenges
Additional Perspectives
Blog Posts & Articles
Buildly Blog
Time to Kill Agile - Buildly’s perspective on evolution
RAD Process Overview - Detailed RAD methodology
Community Discussions
Hacker News threads on Agile criticism
Reddit r/programming discussions
Dev.to articles on post-Agile practices
Podcasts & Talks
Recommended Listening:
“Beyond Agile” - Software Engineering Radio
“The Future of Software Development” - Podcast.__init__
Conference talks on DevOps and continuous delivery
Critical Perspectives
Counterarguments to “Post-Agile”
Not everyone agrees Agile needs replacement. Common counterarguments:
“Agile Still Works”
Many teams successfully use Scrum/Kanban
Problem is poor implementation, not the framework
Simplicity of Agile is its strength
RAD Response:
We agree Agile works for many teams. RAD is for teams ready to evolve further, not a replacement for all Agile.
“This is Just Agile Done Right”
RAD sounds like Agile with better tooling
Agile Manifesto doesn’t mandate sprints
True agility adapts to tools available
RAD Response:
Fair point. RAD is agile (lowercase-a) but moves beyond Agile (capital-A) frameworks and ceremonies.
“Too Much Automation Reduces Human Judgment”
AI can’t replace human creativity
Automated decisions lack context
Teams lose control to algorithms
RAD Response:
RAD emphasizes “automation as collaboration,” not replacement. Humans make decisions, AI provides data and handles repetition.
Further Reading
Books on Software Process Evolution:
Accelerate by Nicole Forsgren, Jez Humble, Gene Kim
The DevOps Handbook by Gene Kim, et al.
Continuous Delivery by Jez Humble, David Farley
Team Topologies by Matthew Skelton, Manuel Pais
Online Resources:
Martin Fowler’s blog - Software design and process
ThoughtWorks Technology Radar - Industry trends
GitHub Octoverse - Developer trends
Academic Journals:
IEEE Software
ACM Transactions on Software Engineering
Journal of Systems and Software
Contributing to the Discussion
Share Your Experience:
Write about your team’s evolution beyond Agile
Present at conferences on RAD adoption
Contribute to open discussions
Share metrics and results
Join the Community:
Buildly community forums
RAD process discussion groups
DevOps and continuous delivery meetups
Note
This field is actively evolving. New research, case studies, and perspectives emerge regularly. Check back for updates.
See also
RAD vs. Capital-A Agile - Detailed RAD vs. Agile comparison
RAD Process: A Replacement for Agile - RAD Process overview
Buildly Resources - Latest thinking on RAD